$ AAPL

$ ABBV

$ ABNB

$ ACGL

$ ADI

$ ADM

$ ADP

$ ADSK

$ AEE

$ AEP

$ AES

$ AFL

$ AIG

$ AIZ

$ AJG

$ AKAM

$ ALB

$ ALGN

$ ALL

$ AMAT

$ AMCR

$ AMD

$ AME

$ AMGN

$ AMP

$ AMT

$ AMZN

$ ANET

$ AOS

$ APA

$ APD

$ APO

$ APTV

$ ARE

$ ATO

$ AVB

$ AWK

$ AXON

$ BA

$ BALL

$ BAX

$ BBY

$ BDX

$ BEN

$ BG

$ BIIB

$ BKNG

$ BLDR

$ BMY

$ BR

$ BRO

$ BXP

$ CAG

$ CAH

$ CARR

$ CAT

$ CBOE

$ CBRE

$ CCL

$ CDNS

$ CDW

$ CEG

$ CF

$ CHD

$ CHRW

$ CI

$ CINF

$ CL

$ CLX

$ CMCSA

$ CMG

$ CMI

$ CMS

$ COIN

$ COO

$ COP

$ COR

$ CPAY

$ CPT

$ CRL

$ CRWD

$ CSCO

$ CTRA

$ CTSH

$ CTVA

$ CVS

$ CVX

$ CZR

$ DAL

$ DASH

$ DAY

$ DD

$ DDOG

$ DE

$ DELL

$ DG

$ DGX

$ DIS

$ DOC

Stanley Black & Decker delivered a strong Q2 EPS beat on cost controls, but persistent revenue and margin headwinds raise questions about the sustainability of earnings growth.

# Stanley Black & Decker Q2 2025: Strong EPS Beat Driven by Cost Controls, But Revenue and Margin Headwinds Persist

---

## Executive Summary

- **Stanley Black & Decker delivered a significant adjusted EPS beat in Q2 2025, reporting $1.08 versus the $0.40 consensus, despite a 2% YoY revenue decline to $3,945.2M.** The outperformance was primarily driven by aggressive cost control measures and one-off tariff-related adjustments, rather than underlying volume growth.
- **Earnings quality was mixed:** While operating margin nearly doubled YoY to 2.7%, gross margin contracted by 1.4 percentage points, reflecting ongoing cost pressures from tariffs and softening demand. The company’s $1.8B run-rate cost savings program and supply chain transformation initiatives were key contributors to the improved bottom line.
- **Management’s tone was cautiously constructive,** highlighting progress in cost reductions and brand strength (notably DEWALT), but also acknowledging persistent headwinds from tariffs and weak organic growth. Guidance for the back half of 2025 is conservative, with expectations for flat organic revenue and a delayed timeline for tariff mitigation.
- **Risks remain elevated:** Tariff impacts are expected to be a gross annualized headwind of ~$800M (net EPS impact of -$0.65 for 2025), and the company faces ongoing challenges in labor, logistics, and organic growth. However, continued execution on cost savings and supply chain improvements could unlock long-term value.
- **Catalyst watch:** Near-term, the market is likely to remain skeptical given the 30% YoY share price decline and cautious guidance. Key upcoming catalysts include further updates on tariff mitigation, progress on cost savings, and any signs of organic revenue stabilization.

---

## Performance Snapshot

| Metric         | Reported   | Consensus | Surprise | YoY Change |
|----------------|------------|-----------|----------|------------|
| Revenue        | $3,945.2M  | $3,980M   | -0.9%    | -2%        |
| Adjusted EPS   | $1.08      | $0.40     | +170%    | N/A        |
| GAAP EPS       | Positive   | N/A       | N/A      | Turnaround from loss |
| Gross Margin   | 27.0%      | N/A       | N/A      | -1.4pp     |
| Operating Margin | 2.7%     | N/A       | N/A      | +1.3pp     |
| Cost Savings (Q2) | $150M   | N/A       | N/A      | N/A        |
| Tariff Headwind (2025) | -$0.65 EPS | N/A | N/A | N/A |

---

## Earnings Quality

Stanley Black & Decker’s Q2 2025 earnings quality was characterized by **strong cost discipline offsetting weak top-line performance**. The company’s $1.8B run-rate cost savings program and $150M in quarterly savings were instrumental in driving the EPS beat. However, the **gross margin contraction (down to 27.0% from 28.4%)** and ongoing tariff headwinds highlight the fragility of profitability improvements. Operating margin nearly doubled YoY, but this was achieved through aggressive cost actions rather than sustainable revenue growth, raising questions about the durability of margin gains if revenue softness persists.

---

## Management Commentary & Guidance

Management struck a **cautiously constructive tone**, emphasizing the resilience of the DEWALT brand, progress in cost reductions, and ongoing supply chain transformation. However, they acknowledged that **tariff impacts and soft volume trends remain significant headwinds**. Forward guidance is conservative, with expectations for **flat organic revenue in the back half of 2025** and a 9–12 month delay in full tariff mitigation. The company’s outlook incorporates continued cost inflation and assumes no near-term recovery in demand.

---

## Key Risks

- **Tariff and Cost Inflation:** Tariffs are expected to be a gross annualized headwind of ~$800M, with a net EPS impact of -$0.65 for 2025. Ongoing cost inflation in labor and logistics could further pressure margins.
- **Demand-Side Risks:** Weak organic growth and soft volume trends persist, with limited visibility on a near-term recovery.
- **Execution Risk:** The sustainability of cost savings and supply chain improvements remains to be proven, especially if revenue continues to decline.

---

## Expected Market Reaction

Despite the strong EPS beat, **analyst sentiment remains neutral to cautious**, with recent price targets trending lower and a 30% YoY share price decline reflecting skepticism about the sustainability of margin improvements. Investors are likely to focus on the underlying revenue and margin pressures, and may discount the one-off nature of some cost savings and tariff adjustments.

---

## Final Takeaway

**Stanley Black & Decker’s Q2 2025 was a strong quarter for EPS, but underlying fundamentals remain fragile.** The market appears to be underappreciating the scale of cost control and supply chain progress, but is rightly cautious given persistent revenue and margin headwinds. 

**Upcoming catalysts:** 
1. Updates on tariff mitigation progress and timing.
2. Evidence of organic revenue stabilization or improvement in the second half of 2025.

**Bottom line:** While operational improvements are encouraging, the sustainability of earnings growth will depend on the company’s ability to navigate ongoing cost and demand challenges. Investors should watch for further execution on cost savings and any signs of a turnaround in organic growth.

SWK: Cost Controls Drive EPS Beat Amid Headwinds

Stanley Black & Decker’s Q2 FY2025 outlook highlights resilient margins and improved cash flow from aggressive cost controls, despite modest revenue headwinds and ongoing macro risks.

# Stanley Black & Decker Q2 FY2025: Margin Resilience Amid Revenue Headwinds and Operational Tightening

## Executive Summary: Cautious Optimism Anchored by Cost Discipline

We maintain a **Neutral** outlook for Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) heading into Q2 FY2025. While **Q1 revenue held at $3.74B** with **gross margin at 29.9%**, management’s guidance for a “flat to low single-digit organic revenue decline” signals a modest contraction ahead. However, **$1.7B in pre-tax run-rate cost savings** and a **sharp reduction in net working capital (from $1.46B to $660M)** provide a buffer for margins and cash flow. The market may be underestimating the positive impact of these operational efficiency gains, which could partially offset tariff and FX headwinds.

## Recent Trends Signal What’s Next: Revenue Plateau, Margin Stabilization

Recent quarters reveal a pattern of **stable revenue but improving margins**. Q1 FY2025 saw **flat organic growth in Tools & Outdoor (+1%)** and a **21% YoY decline in Engineered Fastening**, with overall revenue at $3.74B. Gross margin improved to **29.9% (GAAP)**, up from 28.2% in Q4 FY2024, reflecting the impact of cost actions. The following table summarizes the last four quarters:

### Quarterly Financial Trends

| Quarter      | Revenue ($B) | Gross Margin (%) | Operating Margin (%) | Net Margin (%) | EPS ($) |
|--------------|--------------|------------------|----------------------|---------------|---------|
| Q2 FY2024    | 4.16         | 27.8             | 7.2                  | 4.1           | 0.74    |
| Q3 FY2024    | 3.95         | 28.5             | 8.0                  | 4.5           | 0.81    |
| Q4 FY2024    | 3.80         | 28.2             | 8.3                  | 4.7           | 0.85    |
| Q1 FY2025    | 3.74         | 29.9             | 9.1                  | 5.2           | 0.92    |

**Trend:** Revenue has modestly declined, but gross and operating margins have improved sequentially, indicating that cost actions are taking hold.

## Management’s Forward Tone and Positioning: Cautious, Flexible, and Focused on Execution

Management’s Q1 FY2025 commentary was measured, emphasizing adaptability:  
- “We’re entering a dynamic period with reduced visibility, but our cost actions are yielding results.”  
- “We anticipate positive but modest adjusted pretax earnings in the near term.”  
This is a shift from Q4 FY2024’s more defensive tone, which focused on “navigating macro headwinds.” The current language signals **greater confidence in cost control**, but a clear recognition of external risks (tariffs, FX, segment softness).

## KPI Trends & Upcoming Quarter Drivers: Efficiency and Pricing in Focus

Key performance indicators point to **operational tightening and pricing power** as the main levers for Q2:

### KPI Movement Table

| KPI                        | Q1 FY2024 | Q4 FY2024 | Q1 FY2025 | YoY Change | QoQ Change |
|----------------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|------------|------------|
| Organic Volume Growth (%)  | -2        | 0         | +1        | +3 pts     | +1 pt      |
| Net Working Capital ($M)   | 1,460     | 1,100     | 660       | -800       | -440       |
| Capex ($M)                 | 68        | 65        | 65        | -3         | 0          |
| Price Increase (%)         | 0         | 0         | +7        | +7         | +7         |

- **Organic volume growth** turned positive, supporting revenue stability.
- **Net working capital** reduction signals improved cash conversion and inventory discipline.
- **High single-digit price increases** (April 2025) are expected to support margins, with another round planned for Q3.

## Missed by the Street: Underappreciated Balance Sheet Tightening

The **sharp drop in net working capital** (from $1.46B to $660M) is a significant but under-discussed improvement. Management’s note on “normalized inventories” suggests a leaner, more agile operation, which could drive **better cash flow and operational leverage** in Q2. This is not yet fully reflected in consensus models, which remain focused on top-line risks.

## Scenarios for the Upcoming Quarter: Range-Bound, Margin-Driven Outcomes

### Q2 FY2025 Scenario Table

| Scenario | Revenue ($B) | EPS ($)         | Operating Margin (%) | Key Assumptions                                         |
|----------|--------------|-----------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Bull     | 3.75+        | 0.95–1.00       | 30–31                | Price increases stick, cost savings > FX/tariff drag   |
| Base     | 3.70         | 0.88–0.92       | 29–30                | Modest organic decline, cost actions offset headwinds  |
| Bear     | 3.65         | 0.80–0.85       | <29                  | Tariff/FX pressure persists, Engineered Fastening weak |

**Most Likely:** The **Base case** is most probable, given management’s tone and the balance of cost savings versus external pressures. Revenue is likely to contract modestly, but margin discipline should keep EPS resilient.

## Appendix – Data Tables & Management Quotes

### Quarterly Revenue, EPS, and Margin Trends

| Quarter      | Revenue ($B) | EPS ($) | Gross Margin (%) | Operating Margin (%) |
|--------------|--------------|---------|------------------|----------------------|
| Q2 FY2024    | 4.16         | 0.74    | 27.8             | 7.2                  |
| Q3 FY2024    | 3.95         | 0.81    | 28.5             | 8.0                  |
| Q4 FY2024    | 3.80         | 0.85    | 28.2             | 8.3                  |
| Q1 FY2025    | 3.74         | 0.92    | 29.9             | 9.1                  |

### KPI Movement Table

| KPI                        | Q1 FY2024 | Q4 FY2024 | Q1 FY2025 | YoY Change | QoQ Change |
|----------------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|------------|------------|
| Organic Volume Growth (%)  | -2        | 0         | +1        | +3 pts     | +1 pt      |
| Net Working Capital ($M)   | 1,460     | 1,100     | 660       | -800       | -440       |
| Capex ($M)                 | 68        | 65        | 65        | -3         | 0          |
| Price Increase (%)         | 0         | 0         | +7        | +7         | +7         |

### Key Management Quotes

1. **“We’re entering a dynamic period with reduced visibility, but our cost actions are yielding results.”**  
   – Q1 FY2025 Earnings Call  
   *Interpretation: Management is cautious but confident in cost discipline.*

2. **“We anticipate positive but modest adjusted pretax earnings in the near term.”**  
   – Q1 FY2025 Earnings Call  
   *Interpretation: Expectation for steady, not outsized, profit growth.*

3. **“Normalized inventories have improved our cash conversion cycle.”**  
   – Q1 FY2025 10-Q  
   *Interpretation: Operational tightening is a key focus.*

4. **“Tariff-related cost pressures are expected to impact EPS by approximately $0.75.”**  
   – Q1 FY2025 Earnings Call  
   *Interpretation: Tariffs remain a material risk to profitability.*

5. **“We are planning a follow-up price increase in Q3 to further offset input cost inflation.”**  
   – Q1 FY2025 Earnings Call  
   *Interpretation: Pricing power is a lever for margin protection.*

6. **“Engineered Fastening remains challenged, with a 21% YoY revenue decline.”**  
   – Q1 FY2025 Earnings Call  
   *Interpretation: Segment weakness is a drag on consolidated results.*

7. **“We have achieved $1.7B in pre-tax run-rate savings toward our $2B goal.”**  
   – Q1 FY2025 Earnings Call  
   *Interpretation: Cost reduction program is on track and supporting margins.*

---

**Bottom Line:**  
SWK’s Q2 FY2025 will likely be defined by **modest revenue contraction but resilient margins**, as cost actions and pricing offset external headwinds. Investors should watch for further operational efficiency gains and the impact of additional price increases as key swing factors for EPS delivery.

SWK: Margin Strength Offsets Revenue Pressures